Read this excerpt from the call of the wild.
a scotch half-breed...
a scotch half-breed took charge of him and his mates, and in company with a dozen other dog-teams he started back over the weary trail to dawson. it was no light running now, nor record time, but heavy toil each day, with a heavy load behind; for this was the mail train, carrying word from the world to the men who sought gold under the shadow of the pole.
the third-person-omniscient point of view readers understand this excerpt in a way that they wouldn’t if buck were the narrator because it
provides details about the time of day that cannot be described from a first-person point of view.
provides details about buck’s experiences that cannot be described from a first-person point of view.
gives readers details about buck’s thoughts and feelings that they might not otherwise know.
gives readers details about the historical context that they might not otherwise know.
It provides details about the time of day that cannot be described from a first-person point of view.
The Call of the Wild is a brief adventure book by Jack London, written in 1903 and released in Yukon, Canada, when large snowmobile dogs were in limited supply. A dog called Buck is the lead character of the book. The story starts at a farm in California, where Buck has been kidnapped from his home and raised in Alaska as a working dog.
He's become increasingly wild in the desert environment, where he's forced to fight to live and control other animals. At the end, the dog loses the facade of society, drawing on the primal impulse and learned knowledge to arise as a ruler in the forest.
(i can't select because there is no options but, i will answer) using evidence effectively. most of the assignments you will do in university will ask you to make an argument, to take a stance, or to prove a hypothesis. the best way to do this is to research the topic, develop a thesis statement, hypothesis, or claim and then use evidence to support this claim.
hello, never fear the humanspider is here!
answer: this is what i could find because i never done this work before.
it's likely the answer would be c.
- a - you could speak slowly, but if you used the same humor and a higher complexity or the same level of complexity, they might understand what to do.
- b - the humor presented might not be understandable to the 1st graders.
- d - explaining where peanut butter comes from is irrelevant to the homeeco class.
**c - by adjusting the level of complexity, you are going to a point of talking where everybody understands you, if you what i'm saying.**
note: if you loved this answer click that cool mark brainliest button buddy!
your friendly neighborhood human spider.
a scotch half-breed took charge of him and...